Reflecting on my learning experience in CEP 810 has led me to the realization that I am moving on with more questions than answers—thank goodness for that. From my viewpoint, CEP 810—and I am sure CEP 811 as well—are the gateways into the educational technology (Ed tech) program at Michigan State University. I see now that one of the major purposes of CEP 810 is to help students form framing questions they can take with them throughout their Ed Tech experience. That is not to say I am moving on from CEP 810 without new concrete skills and schema that will both sharpen and broaden my professional practice.
One of the significant ways I see my professional practice changing is my new found understanding of the differences and relationships between experts and novices. While I have a command of the social studies disciplines I teach, my expertise is in the pedagogy in teaching secondary social studies and this sets me apart from an expert, say, in history who may possess expertise in the historical method but lacks the necessary expertise in pedagogy to teach such a method to others. Because of what I have learned in CEP 810 I am now acutely aware that I am not necessarily taking my students to a point of expertise in either social studies or as learners. Instead, I am putting them on a path that will lead them to become experts in their own learning as well as whatever discipline, field, or vocation they choose to pursue.
As alluded to above, the questions I now have regarding not only Ed Tech, but also, good pedagogy greatly outweighs the new schemas and skills I have acquired and for that I am thankful. One of the questions that still remains for me is how can I harness the energy of participatory culture and affinity spaces within my specific field of teaching—social studies. As I observed in my final blog entry addressing the Network Learning Project “exactly what that [the energy of participatory culture and affinity spaces] looks like is not clear to me yet.”
My experience with learning Punya Mishra’s framework of Technology, Pedagogy, Content, and Knowledge (TPACK) has left with me lingering puzzles and problems to solve. TPACK was a bit of epiphany for me. The whole idea of repurposing technology for use in the classroom—both as an aide to the teacher and learning tool for students—has had a profound effect on how I see the evolving role of technology in education. What TPACK looks like specifically in the context of a secondary World History class is an issue I am excited to explore.
CEP 810 has left me with a collection of inquiry pathways to explore and the tools to be successful in my exploration of teaching for understanding with technology.









